Interactive Product Demos & Buyer Enablement3 min readUpdated September 2026

Navattic vs Storylane for a Sponsor Portal Demo

A sponsor deciding between three conferences or two trade publications is usually comparing what they get, not just the audience size. If part of that package is a sponsor portal, showing lead capture, booth traffic, or ad impressions, letting a prospective sponsor click through it before signing does more than another line in a media kit PDF.

Sponsorship budgets are often approved by someone who never speaks directly to your sales team, which is exactly the situation a self-serve, forwardable tour is built to handle.

That internal forwarding is often where sponsorship deals actually get decided, since the person who signs the check frequently isn't the person who took your first call. Treat the tour as one part of a longer sponsorship sales cycle rather than a single deciding factor, since sponsorship decisions typically weigh audience fit and budget alongside whatever the reporting dashboard shows.

Vendors Covered in this Article

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Identify what a sponsor actually logs in to check

For an event, it's usually a lead retrieval and booth traffic dashboard. For a publication, it's an ad performance or impressions dashboard. Build the tour around whichever one your prospective sponsors ask about most on sales calls, since that's the anxiety a tour can actually resolve. If you run both an event and a publication under one brand, resist combining both dashboards into a single tour, since a sponsor evaluating one product rarely wants to wade through reporting for the other to find their answer.

Use a past event or issue, never a live sponsor's real data

Build the tour from a completed event or a past issue's numbers with sponsor names anonymized or replaced. A prospective sponsor recognizing a competitor's real performance numbers inside your sales tool is a confidentiality problem you don't want, regardless of how flattering the numbers look. Even anonymized, check with whoever manages sponsor relationships before publishing, since some sponsorship agreements include language about how a sponsor's data or branding can be reused, even in disguised form, after the engagement ends.

Apply these rules to the data inside the tour:

  • Build the tour from a completed event or a past issue's numbers, never from a live sponsor's data.
  • Anonymize or replace every sponsor name that appears on screen.
  • Remember that a prospect recognizing a competitor's real performance numbers is a confidentiality problem, however flattering the figures look.
  • Check with whoever manages sponsor relationships before publishing, even when the names are anonymized.

Where the tour fits in a sponsorship sales cycle

Sponsorship deals often move slower than a typical software sale and involve a marketing director who wasn't on the original call. Send the tour link as part of the sponsorship deck follow-up so it can be forwarded internally, letting stakeholders who never spoke to your sales team see the actual reporting for themselves. Track whether prospects who received the tour early close faster than those who saw it only at the proposal stage, since that comparison, run over a handful of sponsorship cycles, tells you more about the right timing than a guess would.

Comparing the two platforms for this specific case

Both Navattic and Storylane can capture a reporting dashboard into a guided tour. Ask each vendor how their platform handles a dashboard with charts and graphs specifically, since some interactive demo builders render static screenshots of charts rather than a genuinely clickable version, and confirm which approach each uses before you build anything around it. Also ask each vendor how their platform performs when a dashboard is viewed on a sponsor's phone during a commute, since sponsorship decision-makers often review materials outside a desktop setting between meetings.

A mistake worth flagging: burying the ROI screen

Sponsors care most about the screen that shows what they got for their spend, leads captured, impressions delivered, booth scans. Some tours spend too much time on setup screens and log-in flows before reaching that screen. Lead with the value screen, even if it means the tour starts mid-flow rather than at a natural beginning. It's worth timing your own tour with a stopwatch and asking how many seconds pass before the value screen appears, since a sponsor skimming several vendors' materials in one sitting rarely gives any single tour more than a minute of real attention.

Aligning the tour with your actual sales cycle length

Sponsorship deals can take months to close, involving procurement or finance review on the sponsor's side. A tour sent early in that process, rather than only at the proposal stage, gives internal stakeholders more time to build confidence in the reporting before the final approval conversation happens.

What to do when sponsors ask for something the portal doesn't show

If prospective sponsors keep asking about a metric your current portal doesn't report, that's a signal for your product roadmap, not just your demo. Note the pattern and bring it to whoever owns the portal, since fixing the gap in the actual product matters more than trying to explain it away in the tour.

Working with your events or ad ops team on accuracy

Whoever runs your ad operations or event logistics day to day usually knows the numbers a prospective sponsor will scrutinize most closely, like actual booth traffic counts or verified ad impressions, better than marketing does. Have that person sign off on the figures shown in the tour before it goes live, since a sponsor who later notices a gap between the demo and their actual delivered results has grounds for an uncomfortable renewal conversation.

Executive Capability Standard

What Good Looks Like

Good looks like a sponsor portal tour built on an anonymized past event, leading with the ROI screen sponsors care about most, refreshed after every event or issue.

Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)

1. Learn:Trial both platforms against a screenshot of your actual sponsor dashboard, including any charts, to see how each handles them.
2. Do Manually:Walk your next few sponsorship prospects through the dashboard live before building a self-serve version.
3. Delegate:Assign the tour to whoever manages sponsor reporting, since they know which screen actually answers a sponsor's real question.
4. Automate:Add a tour refresh step to your standard post-event or post-issue reporting checklist.
5. Buy:Subscribe to the platform that best handled charts and graphs in your own dashboard during testing.

How to Get Started

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should different sponsorship tiers get different tours?

If your tiers open up meaningfully different reporting, yes, build a short version for each. If the dashboard looks the same across tiers and only the placement or logo size differs, one tour covering the reporting is enough.

Can we show real numbers if we anonymize the sponsor name?

Using an anonymized past event's real aggregate numbers, without naming the sponsor, is more defensible than fabricating numbers, but confirm with your legal or events team before publishing either approach, since sponsorship agreements sometimes restrict this.

How often should the tour be updated?

After every event or major issue, at minimum, so the numbers shown reflect your current audience size and engagement rather than a dated snapshot from several events ago.

About the numbers

This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.

Related Guides